Mayor intends to serve out term; Council votes 6-0 calling for his resignation, keys, office space, further investigation by County Attorney

Northfield City Council Audience in Council chambers Mayor Lee Lansing

Before Mayor Lee Lansing recused himself from running this morning’s Northfield City Council meeting, he read a brief statement announcing his intent to serve out his term. Mayor Pro-tem Kris Vohs took over the meeting (left photo) and Lansing took a seat in the audience (center).

Lansing then read a longer statement (right) during the open mic part of the meeting. After 18 or so citizens spoke to the council during open mic, councilors took turns explaining their rationale for supporting the resolution calling for him to resign.

The council then voted unanimously for the resolution (see pages 7-9 of packet PDF) which includes having the Mayor vacate his office at city hall and turn over his keys, and that “a copy of the Everett Report be sent to the County Attorney for review to determine if Mayor Lansing’s conduct violated state law.”

Those three paragraphs sound very boring. There was considerable drama throughout this meeting.  The audio is well worth listening to.

Click play to listen. 1 hour 53 minutes. Or download this 52MB MP3.

2:15 - Lansing’s statement of intent to serve out term

3:55 - Discussion of Everett Law fees

11:00 - Start of discussion on the resolution

12:15 - Lansing at open mic

14:30 - Interruption of Lansing by Davis; audience yelling to allow Lansing to continue

17:20 - Interruption of Lansing by Cashman; more audience yelling

18:30 - Interruption of Lansing by Vohs

19:00 - Olivia Frey

21:30 - Victor Summa

22:45 - David Roberts

24:55 - Peggy Prowe

25:55 - Ron Griffith

27:15 - Rhonda Pownell

28:45 - Linelle Olson

29:45 - Martha Cashman

31:15 - Randy Lutz

33:45 - Beth Closner

36:30 - interruption by Vohs, Cashman suggestion

37:30 - Dan Dimick

38:45 - Kiffi Summa

40:00 - Rick Vanasek

42:15 - Jerry Rice

43:15 - Norman Butler

45:20 - Jon Denison

47:50 - Scott Davis

54:45 - Margit Johnson (email read by Deb Little)

56:45 - Felicity Enders (email read by Deb Little)

59:10 - Noah Cashman (1:15:40 - 1:16:00 audio interference accidentally by me)

1:20:30 - Arnie Nelson

1:22:00 - Jim Pokorney

1:35:10 - Kris Vohs

1:42:30 - Jim Pokorney (1:44:30 - audio cut accidentally by me)

1:44:30 - Noah Cashman (partial remarks)

1:45:50 - Arnie Nelson

1:46:25 - Scott Davis

1:47:20 - Jon Denison

1:50:15 - Discussion of and voting on resolution

1:52:00 - Discussion of closing of mayor’s office space, keys

1:52:45 - Motion to adjourn

Posted in Government

184 comments so far

  1. Icon
    Curt Benson
    December 22, 2007 12:52 pm

    I attended the council meeting this am. I thought the citizen input at the open mike and the councilors statements were very damaging towards Lansing. Several councilors spoke of their long friendships with Lansing and how it was difficult for them to do what had to be done in this case. I don’t see how this can be called a “witch hunt”.

    Councilor Cashman spoke about his past experience as a prosecutor and said that he thought Lansing’s actions regarding the liquor store selection process were like bribery, and could be considered felonies.

    #1

  2. Icon
    Griff Wigley
    December 22, 2007 1:25 pm

    Posted just before noon today, Northfield News reporter Suzy Rook filed this story: Mayor refuses to step down; Resolution censures mayor, loses office

    #2

  3. Icon
    kiffi summa
    December 22, 2007 3:25 pm

    Curt : You neglected to mention the citizen comments that supported the Mayor. I haven’t counted each “side” up, but I will.

    #3

  4. Icon
    Skip Zimmerman
    December 22, 2007 4:05 pm

    As I weigh my reactions to this latest development, I’d love to see a discussion about the specifics of a recall. Not having been through one before (and perhaps having been distracted by that gorgeous cheerleader in civics class), I’d like to ask:

    1. How does a recall work and what is the process?
    2. Who organizes it/calls for it? A petition by voters? The Council? The board of elections?
    3. How much does a recall cost?
    4. How long does a recall take?
    5. What alternatives are there to a recall?
    6. How much time is left in the Mayor’s current term?

    #4

  5. Icon
    Griff Wigley
    December 22, 2007 4:50 pm

    Posted to the Strib web site at 4 pm by reporter Sarah Lemagie: Northfield council censures mayor, asks him to resign

    #5

  6. Icon
    Felicity Enders
    December 22, 2007 6:27 pm

    Skip: The specifics of a recall as outlined in Northfield’s charter (see PART I, Chapter 6) are somewhat confusing. However, the Northfield News had an article outlining the details in early November. As far as I, a non-lawyer-type can understand it, the News article appears to align with the charter’s requirements.

    #6

  7. Icon
    John George
    December 22, 2007 8:10 pm

    This is really an unfortunate turn of events. It seems the pattern for leaders in our country over last decade or so has been to evade responsibility for their actions. Though, I suppose, this seems to be a pattern in the whole population, from the president down to my 2 year old grandson. I guess it is little wonder that this behavior goes on in our government. Maybe people just don’t grow up anymore.

    It seems to me that if the mayor had gotten up and said something like, “Folks, I’m really sorry for what I did. I didn’t think it was wrong at the time, and I’m still a little unclear on some things right now, but, according to this investigation, it appears I have not followed the city charter as I should have. I am willing to take whatever steps you think I need to take to correct this.” How much ill will do you suppose this would have eliminated? How much healing to the fractures in the city goivernment do you think this would have mended? Unfortunately, he did not, and we won’t know.

    In reading through the report, it just stands out to me how much the mayor was involved in the whole process with the liquor store. If he was going to recuse himself from the process, it appears he did not. I don’t understand how this was not clear to him at the time, but I have been deceived before myself, so I will extend that allowance to him. It would be so appropriate for him to admit that, though.

    As far as a recall process, this is pretty clearly laid out in the charter. Someone will have the odious responsibility to get this started. If we as a city do not, the inaction will weaken the foundation of laws we are built upon. Distasteful as it appears, it looks like something that must be done. Happy New Year, everyone! (Sorry about the sarchasm in that last statement, Griff!)

    #7

  8. Icon
    Sean Hayford O'Leary
    December 22, 2007 9:46 pm

    The mayor is embarrassing himself and the city by not resigning when he has the council unanimously demanding it.

    Even if thinks he did nothing wrong — even if a healthy chunk of citizens think he did nothing wrong — there is just too much animosity for him to do anything productive with the rest of his term.

    As for the thoughts of this citizen, I was 90% hopeful he would resign until yesterday, when I was bumped to 100 by Jim Pokorney’s excellent letter to the editor.

    #8

  9. Icon
    Griff Wigley
    December 22, 2007 11:27 pm

    Posted to the Strib site at 10 pm, presumably for the Sunday print edition: Northfield mayor loses desk and key.

    Update 12/23 6 am: this story is on front page of today’s Strib, above the fold

    #9

  10. Icon
    Christine Stanton
    December 23, 2007 1:11 am

    I listened to the meeting as I was wrapping presents tonight. The whole situation is sad….

    I was actually shocked by the way Lee Lansing was treated along with others who wished to speak. Frankly, I had to turn it off toward the end after too many rambles from Noah Cashman. (I think Scott Davis needs to move to the other side of the table.) Arnie Nelson and Jim Pokorney’s comments mirror my own thoughts and Jon Dennison’s heart is in the right place.

    It is sad to say that I have to agree with Sean’s #8 comments. To me, it is not because of the findings of the Everett report, but for the health of our city and Lee Lansing personally.

    David Roberts commented that “It’s Christmastime.” I think we really need to remember the true meaning of that this year in Northfield, whether we are Christian’s or not. Our moral standards for how we treat others need some serious thought.

    #10

  11. Icon
    Griff Wigley
    December 23, 2007 7:19 am

    I’ve added audio time markers to everyone who spoke at the meeting and added this to the blog entry above.

    In addition to Councilors, the citizens who spoke were:

    Beth Closner
    Dan Dimick
    David Roberts
    Felicity Enders (email read by Deb Little)
    Jerry Rice
    Kiffi Summa
    Linelle Olson
    Margit Johnson (email read by Deb Little)
    Martha Cashman
    Norman Butler
    Olivia Frey
    Peggy Prowe
    Randy Lutz
    Rhonda Pownell
    Rick Vanasek
    Ron Griffith
    Victor Summa

    #11

  12. Icon
    kiffi summa
    December 23, 2007 7:28 am

    Christine said: “Our moral standards for how we treat others need some serious thought”…..

    I think that is maybe the simplest, most direct, applicable statement that has been made with reference to the “cannibalization” of one, by the other six of his “Tribe”.

    If there is one of the other six, who says they are “clean”, let them come forward and be challenged… Sounds too Biblical ? Well, isn’t that what we’ve seen here? The holier-than-thou types will be all up in arms at me for this, but there are epic struggles in the Bible stories, and all those sanctimonius “accusers”, in the “temple” yesterday morning, should have thought of their own actions ( to say nothing of their own council votes)
    before they picked up the stones.

    #12

  13. Icon
    norman butler
    December 23, 2007 8:27 am

    Well, it’s official then; we have a City Manager/Weak Mayor form of government contrary to the will of the people as expressed in the 2001 referendum yet in agreement with the will of The Charter Commission (2001-2004) and the collusion of the past two Councils (2001-2008).

    They have taken his office space (can we be remodeled for the Prayer Ladies I wonder), his keys..why not his testicles (since he persists in not resigning) or would that be considered unethical?. The King is dead (Mayor)! Long Live The King (City Manager)!

    Now all you subjects who keep wanting this Strong Mayor/City Administrator form of government…and a Building Board Of Appeal….or a prosperous and vibrant downtown…and as for a liquor store downtown…or more than 30 seconds at the open mic…did I say 30, I meant only 10….or repeal of the finest piece of local law ever written, The Rental Ordinance…well, pay attention now because I’ll only say this once…

    #13

  14. Icon
    David Henson
    December 23, 2007 10:14 am

    Griff - split up MP3s and all very impressive - really shows off the power of new media ! I felt like I had listened to a palace coup. The interpretation the 6 councilors offered up was really over the top. They complained that the Mayor was not reporting to them properly as though Northfield elected the mayor to be their servant. Then one councilman goes on about how he told the mayor what he should and should not talk about legally. I honestly think these councilmen have become convinced that Northfield elected 6 Mayors and 1 agent who was to act as their servant or reporter. I believe most of Northfield voted for the Mayor as the top executive and if they voted at all for councilmen, did so with the understanding that their role was subordinate. The fact is when the state auditor refused to look into the Lansing issue - undoubtedly because it had no legs - they hired a special investigator with $40,000 (Lee should never have agreed to this type of waste but one could see he was in a bind). At $653.77 per page we should expect Mark Twain quality writing (I was disappointed) but we should not expect the purveyor to be any more neutral than a hit-man.

    The council members stated their decision was based on an overwhelming voter opinion against Lee. The reality, at the meeting was, excepting one councilman’s sister and two angry development partners (do they live in Northfield ?) with axes to grind, exactly “one” citizen named Peggy spoke against Lee. I did not count but around a dozen citizens spoke in his favor.

    I wonder where Lee will set up his Mayor-Citizens meetings and how these resolutions will be handled by the city council ? The Cow ?

    #14

  15. Icon
    Martha Cashman
    December 23, 2007 11:26 am

    David,

    Although I am the sister of one the Council members; I AM a taxpaying, local shopper and resident of Northfield. My husband and I CHOOSE to relocate to Northfield because of the progressive, civic involvement and neighborliness of the community. The added benefit was close proximity to each of our extended families.

    I am an educated citizen, I do my own research into topics of concern (including purchasing and reading the book “Denison Iowa”) , and draw my own conclusions.

    Others have said it very clearly on this thread, the actions of the mayor are an embarrassment to Northfield. His actions have polarized this community. He needs to take responsibility for his actions — his motivations (Lee the man and father and Lee the mayor) for those actions are immaterial. He has breached the trust of many of the citizens of this community. If he truly cares for Northfield, he will do what is honorable and right — he will resign and help this community heal.

    If there are other issues lurking within city hall and city government, they will surface and be addressed by the city council and the body politic.

    Martha

    #15

  16. Icon
    David Henson
    December 23, 2007 11:49 am

    Martha -

    I agree, without a doubt, a very bright and articulate “sister” !

    But , I have bought items from Lee, sold items to Lee, I think his development would be great for Northfield, I voted for him, I would vote for him again. And I think there are forces that would like the liquor store out by chains to insure the downtown implodes and that Lee is standing in valiantly and fighting to improve downtown Northfield and keeping the community from becoming just another suburb.

    #16

  17. Icon
    Martha Cashman
    December 23, 2007 12:14 pm

    David,

    I, too, have patronized the mayor’s hardware store … purchasing everything from bungee cords, to paint, to a garden cart. The issues with the mayor are not about him as businessman who serves the community. The issues concern his behavior as mayor. Even if you remove Mr. Everett’s comments and you look only at the memo’s that the mayor sent, his tone and intent is quite clear. And, these were sent of his own volition and in his own words. I find them to be quite damning and they substantiate the mayor’s inappropriate behavior.

    The discussion is not really about the merits of a new liquor store located downtown. Personally, I think a larger liquor store that is located downtown is a terrific idea. Again, the merits of a new, downtown liquor store is not germaine to the issue. It is about the behavior by the mayor to inappropriately use his position to influence the outcome of the decision process.

    Martha

    #17

  18. Icon
    Curt Benson
    December 23, 2007 12:14 pm

    David, I don’t believe your assessment of why the state auditor declined to look into Northfields’ situation in your post #14 isl correct.

    You said:

    ” The fact is when the state auditor refused to look into the Lansing issue - undoubtedly because it had no legs - they hired a special investigator with $40,000″

    The state auditor declined because the issues were not in its purview. It was the state auditor that suggested that the city would be better served if it hired a special investigator. I can’t find the test of the auditor’s letter to Northfield, but it is explained in this article from the News:

    http://northfieldnews.com/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=20925&SectionID=21&SubSectionID=451&S=1

    #18

  19. Icon
    David Henson
    December 23, 2007 1:01 pm

    From the state auditor website:

    http://www.osa.state.mn.us/default.aspx?page=description

    “The Audit Practice Division …. audits for evidence of whether local government activities are being administered in accordance with Minnesota law”

    “The Legal/Special Investigations Division investigates allegations of theft or misuse of public funds. It also provides legal compliance expertise to the State Auditor’s several divisions and … to local government officials. ”

    I think the state auditor would not pursue because the threshold of malfeasance was was too weak and it looked like a local cat fight and pursuing such would have a chilling effect on local governments throughout the state.

    My prediction is this issue is not going away and that it will be great for Northfield because the showdown between a citizen/businessman leader backed by the will of the people verses lawyers and bureaucrats will be of great interest beyond Northfield’s borders. High paid private special investigators in a town of 15,000, I mean please.

    #19

  20. Icon
    Holly Cairns
    December 23, 2007 1:17 pm

    I feel that taking someone’s desk and keys is ridiculous. I’ve heard of nuns doing that kind of thing, but not city officials? What the heck?

    Sorry, I can’t go along with that. I think time would have helped to move him out, but taking keys and desks… that’s embarrassing. Sounds like junior high antics.

    Also, the Porkorney letter. Does Porkorney have a degree in physchology? Or what? In his article, he seems to say there’s two Lansing personalities. I didn’t like the article, and I don’t like it when people make judgements and do a smear campaign based on uneducated guesses, unless Porkorney is a phychologist or pychiatrist, and in that case, I’m sorry for doubting his assessment.

    I think this should be handled in the courts instead of on the streets.

    #20

  21. Icon
    norman butler
    December 23, 2007 1:19 pm

    Well said, David Henson

    #21

  22. Icon
    Lisa Guidry
    December 23, 2007 2:44 pm

    Holly I am 100% in favor that the mayor should resign and turn in his keys. According to the Star Stribune he still hasn’t turned the keys in. I personally believe that if he hasn’t turned the keys in by Monday AM , the city should have the the building rekeyed at the mayor’s expense. I do not trust or respect the mayor any longer and I’m not comfortable with him having the keys.

    #22

  23. Icon
    Mike Bull
    December 23, 2007 3:01 pm

    Having listened to as much of this meeting as I could (in between buying stocking stuffers, and wrapping presents… and, ironically, running to the liquor store), my sense was that the city council came out of the meeting looking much worse than it did going in.

    As I semi-engaged citizen… I just can’t figure out what the heck is going on in our little town. I’ve paid attention to each individual situation, starting with Gary Smith’s press conference, then the Lansings, then the prayer meetings, then the suit…. on and on, and now this. What in the world is going on here in Northfield? Maybe that’s a different thread, but I have to admit, I’m flummoxed. Is our government here different or worse than other towns our size? Can we blame it on the media somehow? Are we taking ourselves too seriously? Not seriously enough?

    #23

  24. Icon
    Lisa Guidry
    December 23, 2007 3:36 pm

    Well David if the mayor-citizen meetings are going to be held at the Cow,
    I’ll be on the other side of the pub disagreeing with the small fan gathering. I also believe David that you are being biased with your comments.

    #24

  25. Icon
    kiffi summa
    December 23, 2007 4:32 pm

    Good questions, Mike…

    Here’s another, since the Mayor cannot be removed from office by the council, only censured, what does this mean to the Issue of “the keys”?

    He IS still the Mayor (elected by some 6500 people), and if the office he uses is a privilege/function of his title, as is the office the councilors use is a privilege of their status (both of these office situations created in this term, by the way) then how can the council’s censure strip him of the rights still accruing to his status……

    I don’t see how this resolution does anything that is legally binding other than officially censure him?

    #25

  26. Icon
    Sean Hayford O'Leary
    December 23, 2007 6:26 pm

    Kiffi, surely the city council knew what they did and did not have the power to do. It seems plausible that they have control over who has access to city hall.

    Lisa, I don’t entirely agree with your comment #22, in which you said, “I do not trust or respect the mayor any longer and I’m not comfortable with him having the keys” — I don’t exactly imagine him loading up computers and file cabinets in his truck and selling them on eBay. I do agree that the mayor should comply with the council’s order, though.

    #26

  27. Icon
    Mike Bull
    December 23, 2007 6:33 pm

    Well, my thought on the council’s “order” is that I don’t think I *want* the city council to have the authority to force the mayor out of office, either directly or indirectly (through this key thing). In any sort of executive branch/legislative branch relationship — which is how I see the mayor/city council relationship — there needs to be checks and balances. My preference is that the city council leave the issue of who Northfield’s mayor is to Northfield voters, through directly voting and recall elections, or to the courts, in the event that the mayor has done something criminal.

    #27

  28. Icon
    Martha Cashman
    December 23, 2007 7:21 pm

    In the spirit of public disclosure, I should acknowledge that David Henson is my ex-brother in-law.

    Kiffi, enough with the paranoia and conspiracy theory stuff! There is NO “train” from Denison IA and, last I checked, all six council members are highly respected, long-time residents of Northfield. They did not arrive on any “train”. The council and the administrator have not “destroyed a man, a family, a community….” The mayor and his supporters should re-read the mayor’s memos then take a look in the mirror. Who is destroying whom?

    The six council members are doing their job as publicly elected, participating members of a civil society. At least three of the members have had a friendship with the mayor for near fifty years. Yet, they voted according to the facts and what the laws of the land dictate. They were not coerced or bullied. They did the job we elected them to do — to uphold the laws of this town. It was an agonizing, difficult, unanimous vote.

    Regarding the “Pharisee’s” (Random House Dictionary: “a sanctimonious, self righteous, or hypocritical person”) in the temple, I would again direct certain contributors on this thread to look in the mirror. Certain “high volume” bloggers have consistently posted rumors and innuendos that have hurt and damaged city employees (and their families); as well as six stalwart council members (their families and professional reputations). WHERE ARE YOUR FACTS??? What happened or did not happen in Denison IA is not relevant to what is happening in Northfield.

    The “high volume” bloggers (HVB’s) have refused to let the facts speak for themselves. The HVB’s have chosen sides in spite of the mayor’s own words contained in his memos. IF there is further mischief in city hall or with the council it too will reveal itself. Once it is FACTUALLY substantiated, it is then appropriate to take action. Speculation and innuendo are not facts.

    As I stated in my remarks on Saturday morning, “… God forbid any one who has the gall to disagree with the very vocal minority.” If you choose to disagree you are castigated and civil discourse is thrown to the wind.

    I was cautioned (not by my brother) by another long time member of the council that they hoped that I knew what I was getting into if I choose to express my views about the mayor. I have been told by other friends and acquaintances that they would not publicly express their views on the subject of the mayor because they feared retribution.

    Well folks, about two hours ago, I went to take my daughter to do some shopping. The trip was delayed because some fine citizen had strewn garbage all over my driveway and front lawn. It was not the ‘type’ of garbage blown in by the wind/weather. So much for another constitutionally protected freedom — freedom of speech. Shame, shame, shame on who-ever did this dirty deed!!!!

    Finally, regarding retrieving the “Grand Master Keys” for city hall that are in mayor’s possession. Perhaps some of you have not been in the position of supervising individuals who have access to critical personnel information. I have supervised well over a thousand employees. When a person is suspected of malfeasance it is imperative that access to critical files is eliminated. It is good business practices and reduces the potential liability for one’s self as well as the institution that employs you.

    It is okay to beg for forgiveness for the mayor’s indiscretion however; those who constantly stir-the-pot on every issue refuse to apply the same standard to others. Surprise, surprise — another double standard.

    Well, I am going to go check my yard to see if any new garbage has been deposited. I am so disappointed in the behavior of some Northfield residents. Nothing I have done or said deserves this kind of behavior. It sure makes me feel great about living here….

    #28

  29. Icon
    Lisa Guidry
    December 23, 2007 7:54 pm

    Martha I’m sorry that you had to experience retaliation for freedom of speech. I hope this won’t discourage you and prevent you from blogging in the future.

    #29

  30. Icon
    Anne Bretts
    December 23, 2007 8:30 pm

    Martha,
    Don’t let anyone get you down. Lots of people agree with you and you’ll start hearing from them as soon as they know what you’re posting. I get positive comments all the time. The idea that a majority supports the mayor is pure speculation. We all speak for ourselves, no one else.
    I couldn’t be there Saturday morning, but I am proud the council took a stand on principle.
    The people who don’t believe the report never will, no matter how many facts are presented.
    For the record, I don’t have a stake in the outcome here. I moved here after the last mayoral election.
    In 20 years of covering and following local government in three states, I can’t remember an investigator’s report being more clear and unequivocal.
    According to some on this site over the last months, I don’t know what I’m talking about. Six councilors came to the same conclusion and they are wrong. The News came to the same conclusion, and the News doesn’t know what it’s talking about. The independent investigator provided 61 pages of the mayor’s own words damning him, and the investigator is wrong. Representatives from every major news organization in the state have read the report and they don’t know what they’re talking about.
    So everyone is wrong and the mayor is right. And we could do six more investigations with six more independent investigators, and the mayor and a handful of supporters wouldn’t believe them and would maintain that others are more guilty. As I said earlier, the fact that the mayor and his friends don’t see that he’s done anything wrong is the scariest part of this whole situation. It means they will feel free to do this again…and again.
    This is not a witch hunt; these were issues for which the mayor sought an investigation. He just doesn’t like what the investigation revealed. He asked the question and now he doesn’t like the answer.
    The real witch hunt has happened over the last year, as a small group of people have slandered the council and administrator repeatedly, without presenting a shred of solid evidence. Even now there is no evidence. The investigator searched and found nothing. The big flap over mishandling the pay plan…nothing. They had a chance to convince convince the investigator and had nothing to offer. Mr. Roder was cleared on every matter covered in the report. (Other investigations are pending, but have not shown any wrongding to date.)
    All these people were interviewed and showed no evidence to support their version of the story. There are just vague hints of ‘everyone sharing blame’ and some past evil in Iowa…
    What we do have are facts about the here and now. The council has taken a stand. Now it’s time for the citizens to join the council in standing up for what’s right. Call the mayor, write to him, e-mail him and tell him respectfully that it’s time for him to do the right thing and leave.
    And of course, he should turn in his keys.
    The only question now is whether we have to start the recall process, or whether Mr. Lansing will come to his senses. This is not something we want, but another burden the mayor has put on the citizens because he puts his personal desire to be mayor above the good of the city.

    #30

  31. Icon
    Martha Cashman
    December 23, 2007 8:40 pm

    Thank you, Lisa. It is very difficult for me. I am so disappointed. I hope you enjoy all of the Blessings of the Season. In the New Year, may the City heal and become an enchanted place to call home — once again.

    #31

  32. Icon
    Holly Cairns
    December 23, 2007 8:42 pm

    Lisa, rekeyed? At his expense? Wow.

    C’mon. Let’s sit back and take a breath. I don’t want to read about any “take downs” where someone wrestles the keys from MAYOR Lansing, either.

    Ridiculous.

    Exerting undue pressure isn’t the same as stealing 3.8 gazillion dollars. What about all the missing money? That is what makes me think twice.

    As far as Lansing having access to major files– hmm, he’s had that for a while, now. And he won’t be stealing product information or anything. What’s he going to take that he would benefit from?

    And who spread garbage on Marsha’s drive? Now that is going too far.

    Barnum is going to bring the bigtop, and we’re all going to run around in it. Faribault and Farmington folks can pay $8.00 to see us all perform.

    #32

  33. Icon
    Martha Cashman
    December 23, 2007 8:54 pm

    Anne, thank you for kind words of support. I too have been politically active all of my adult life. In fact, in my past life, I was offered a presidential political appointment and have been repeatedly invited to attend the Renaissance Weekend in Hilton Head. I have been around the proverbial “block” a few times. However, I have never witnessed or experienced what I have experienced here in Northfield.

    I too moved here two years ago. I cannot recall if the mayor was on the only ballot I cast as a resident of Northfield. I may have been too distracted by my husband dying of leukemia.

    Holly, my name is MARTHA — not Marsha. If you are implying that I would fabricate the garbage on my lawn then I am outraged and insulted. I am known in the political and business world as a “straight-shooter”. My actions and decisions are based on reality and facts.

    #33

  34. Icon
    John George
    December 23, 2007 9:00 pm

    Martha- In the imortal words of Winston Churchill, “Never give up!” This is definitely the height of ridiculousness and the bottom of the barrel of local politics, all in one event. My heart goes out to you! If I knew where you lived, I would personally come over and clean up your yard, but don’t divulge that here. It appears that someone is throwing more than “stones” in this event.

    And to your whole post #28, I say AMEN!

    #34

  35. Icon
    Lisa Guidry
    December 23, 2007 9:00 pm

    Martha keep your head up, I respect people that say it like it is. I don’t sugar coat anything either, and alot of people can’t handle straight forwardness. It is what it is , so walk on and make your mark in life.

    #35

  36. Icon
    Skip Zimmerman
    December 23, 2007 9:07 pm

    I’ll echo Lisa’s comments in support of Martha. I’ve never met you, Martha, and don’t know you, but I’m appalled that such behavior might be perpetrated against anyone with the cajones to give voice to sentiment in a community as thoughtfully supportive of free speech as Northfield is.

    Griff, et al., there’s a serious tragedy in this one, and I’d assert that it would certainly be well worth starting a separate thread on this to see if any such culprit will shed the cowardice and ignorance of the white hood and be willing to add their thought-leadership to the continuum. Hmm…Just childish. (Oops, better go check my lawn - that’s 811 St. Olaf Avenue, in case this yahoo has some extra cowardice to throw)!

    Martha, someone stupid enough to do this is probably dumb enough to leave an old envelope with a complete mailing address in the mess. Might be worth a look! In fact, if they’re reading this, I expect their immediate response will be something akin to, “oh, ‘poop’…! Did I dump and run without sorting out the junk mail?”

    Anyway, at the very least if enough people post in protest, the cowardly lion will eventually run out of stuff to throw and we can get on with the other discussions. Whaddya say, Griff-ol’-Wizard-ol’-pal? Care to help this person find some COURAGE?

    #36

  37. Icon
    Skip Zimmerman
    December 23, 2007 9:15 pm

    Ahh…and a deep breath in the thick of the fight, Martha. I didn’t read anything like accusation into Holly’s comment. Only heartfelt support and surprise, given with a downcast eye and a sadly shaking head.

    #37

  38. Icon
    Martha Cashman
    December 23, 2007 9:19 pm

    What has happened has happened. I do wish this community would return to civil discourse — POLITELY agree to disagree. No retribution unless the one’s actions threaten the integrity of the City and its’ residents. This is a very small fish bowl and I would like to live here IN PEACE, with many friends, for the remainder of my years.

    I do not care who the culprit is — I want the insanity and divisiveness to end. I want the wonderful, magical community with a strong, vibrant downtown and arts community that my husnad and I chose together. I want the Northfield that mowed my lawn, prepared meals for me and my children — the Northfield that lovingly cared for me and my children although we were unknown quantities. I want that Northfield back.

    I am moving on and do not intend to hunt down the culprit. They must live with their own shame. In the end, this will be worse than anything I, or any one else can do.

    #38

  39. Icon
    kiffi summa
    December 23, 2007 9:46 pm

    From the beginning, I have asked that people not choose sides until ALL the investigations were completed and the facts could be weighed with respect to each other. If you went back in these archives you would see that being said over and over; but very early on, in July, the council started choosing sides between two of their employees, the administrator and the police chief. That was very wrong, it set the stage for divisiveness, and from there it went on, and on.

    The attacking of a citizen, by the administrator, and others, when the issue of the prayer ladies secreted in the administrator’s office was brought to the open mic, was in my view another point of exacerbation.

    You must remember that the only person who could NOT have leaked the initial packet to the paper was the Mayor, as it was all damaging to him. So that was someone at city hall who did that. I understand the newspaper publisher apologized to the mayor for the disclosure of private information, but it wasn’t in the paper at all, just in the office.

    You must also remember that the Mayor was the one who asked for the initial investigation by the State; does that look like someone with something to fear? Who resisted? the council. What did they have to be concerned about? Considering what has happened, I don’t think their supposed concern for the “city” was very sincere.

    Let’s also remember that the issue of the liquor store tapes which has been made so much of…. well, it was the council who would not let them be public from May ’til late Fall, and then cried”foul” when other financially involved parties raised concerns. I would think Ray Cox might comment on this if he weren’t running for office; I fully understand why he doesn’t care to now.

    I wouldn’t be too sure of the numbers on who supports who; remember there are a lot of good, principled people in this community who do not like “to sit in the front Pew”.

    I could go on, but EVERYONE is now too polarized by the severity of the
    events to go on with a discussion of issues only, myself included, because of the way the issues have not been able to remain as such without involving personalities. Unfortunately, people who are elected to public office cannot have their actions divorced from comment. Not the Mayor, nor anyone else on the council.

    I’m very sorry that you, Martha, had to experience the trash in your driveway; maybe it was the same person who shot the b-bs in my front windows during the Target debate. There is a punitive aspect to some of the behavior in this community, and many people have experienced it, on various issues.

    I’d also like to make clear I don’t believe in conspiracies; I do believe that history” repeats itself, and that persons who have issues of power seek places wherein they can exercise that need.

    I personally would welcome a referendum in which all the council, including the Mayor, who IS one of the council still, and the city administrator, are rated as to “stay or go”. The elected officials should only be evaluated by the electorate, and the administrator has been too intimately involved with what appears to be negative dynamics…

    Northfield is a town that faces many serious economic and social problems, as do many small towns…and the fact that so many people care so deeply, whether they comment here or not, is a good, not a bad thing. I don’t hate anybody; I am deeply disturbed by the lack of dealing with problems before they become exacerbated, whether by acts of commission or omission.

    So, You can go ahead and “bitch” at me all you want…
    Peace in the New Year!

    #39

  40. Icon
    Holly Cairns
    December 23, 2007 9:53 pm

    Martha. Not Marsha. And I don’t think you fabricated anything, and I find it horrible.

    Fishbowl– that reminds me:

    Take a fish and put it in boiling water, and it will instantly die, but gradually increase the water’s temperature and you’ll have a fish swimming like mad when it boils.

    Feels like it’s boiling here in Northfield.

    #40

  41. Icon
    Martha Cashman
    December 23, 2007 10:08 pm

    Holly, thank you. I agree with you it is boiling and I, along with many others are “tired of swimming like mad when it boils”. Life should be joyful.

    #41

  42. Icon
    Anne Bretts
    December 23, 2007 10:35 pm

    Martha, I am so sorry for your loss. There are so many new people chiming in here now and so many new people in town, it can be very hard to figure out what’s going on and where we fit. But there are great people here and it can be a wonderful place.
    So, I have been mulling this over for weeks and it seems that it might be a good idea after all. I’m thinking it would be great to do a 12th Night party to celebrate the end of the Christmas season and the beginning of a new year and the reflective beauty of winter and new friendships and meeting people we only know online and the return of food without sprinkles or whipped cream and anything else that comes to mind.
    The problem is that the 12th night is Jan. 6, a Sunday and I’m not competing with the events at the Cow. Also Saturday is a better night for a party. So in the interest of goodwill, civil conversation and just plain fun, I think it will be a 12th night’s eve party on the 11th night, Jan. 5.
    More details later, but these parties are just plain fun.
    In the meantime, Martha (and anyone else who wants to talk more or meet people) just e-mail me at editoranne@yahoo.com and we can start integrating some face time into this online community. I’m working on an informal newcomers network and it seems as though there are a lot of us.
    Have a comforting, hopeful Christmas.

    #42

  43. Icon
    David Henson
    December 23, 2007 10:50 pm

    Griff - I know people can differ on the highjacking by the council but clearly these posts are an attempt to highjack this thread.

    #43

  44. Icon
    Patrick Enders
    December 23, 2007 10:51 pm

    Martha,
    My sympathies regarding the mess on your lawn. I’d never imagined ‘discourse’ could sink to that level in this fine town.

    Also, you are at least not completely alone in your conclusions regarding the Mayor’s activities. I’m fairly certain that six council members, a newspaper editorial board, an investigator, and a minimum of five or six other persons are deeply alarmed by Mayor Lansing’s actions. Locally Grown is a bit of an echo chamber, where a fairly small number of persons - maybe a dozen or two, including myself - post repeatedly on these subjects. What the rest of Northfield thinks is anyone’s guess.

    I hope you can still have a wonderful holiday. Perhaps in the new year we’ll find a democratic way to sort this all out.

    #44

  45. Icon
    Christine Stanton
    December 23, 2007 11:14 pm

    I worked for many years in retail. During the Christmas season (and other times of the year) there were always those “difficult” customers. After our second daughter died suddenly in 1999, I went back to work and thought, “We never know where people are coming from.” Those difficult customers might have had a family member die, or be having a difficult moment, day, life, or year. Life can be tough and painful at times.

    Yes, Martha, it SOULD be joyful, but that is not always reality. That thought I mentioned above has allowed me to be more patient and compassionate. I am not a saint, so I need to remind myself of that thought often. Yes, my faith is strong, but at times I too get “tired or swimming like mad when it boils.”

    Good or bad, my mental and emotional health has forced me to see that there is always another option. Maybe instead of swimming like mad there comes a times when we need to jump out of the boiling pot. Who is right and who is wrong no longer matters. What maters is survival–our physical, mental, and emotional survival. Along with that is the hope that this too shall pass, and there is something more. That is the hope I wish for Lee Lansing and his family.

    No, I am not a psychologist, but I have had the opportunity to find a wonderful one to help me through my struggles.

    (Just to be clear. Martha, I am NOT saying that you need a therapist. In fact, I hope and pray you do not. You have every right to be angry about having garbage thrown on your lawn. Maybe if the culprits would have “thought” about what they are doing, they would have made another decision. Frankly, I have a hard time believing that any adult would do such a thing. It was probably some kids who had no idea about your political involvement. IF, it was (an) adult(s), I would be more than appalled.)

    Christmas comes whether we are “prepared” or not. Christmas comes even when we are sad, angry, happy, joyful, naive, wrong, or right. That is the beauty. Christmas comes whether we are in the “spirit of the season” or not. Peace….

    #45

  46. Icon
    Martha Cashman
    December 24, 2007 12:27 am

    David, I have not “hijacked this thread. I expressed my position as a citizen about the mayor breach of ethical behavior and I have suffered repercussions. I work to support my family, I pay taxes. My husband and I started our own foundation to address the needs of others. I resent that what began as request for the mayor to acknowledge his behavior and resign to help the community to heal has become a personal attack on me to hijack this thread.

    Christine, I am no saint. I have many flaws that have been pointed out to me, these flaws I have either had to live with or work very hard to correct. Life’s adversities have made me a strong, focused individual. I have deftly dealt with issues that make the mayor’s problems look like chump change. Clearly, you do not believe me — so be it. I am not here to live up to your expectations. You do not know me — I do not know you. I do know the published record of the mayor’s actions.

    Christine, just for the record, I worked for four years in a small hardware store; I worked for a canning company on the beans line with Mexican immigrants; I worked for a retail store for six years while I was at the university, I got up at 4 am to do food prep for the dorm meals; I was a resident advisor for two years counseling freshman students; I was a senior nursing assistant for four years working with quads/paras/burn patients and brain injury patients; I have suffered the loss of a brother and a husband; I have run major humanitarian organizations; I have run my own in-home eldercare business; and now, with what I hope is my last job, I am working to save the small communities of rural America. I am trying to give back to the farmers and ranchers who have supported me over the past twenty years.

    I have tried my best to be honest, direct and express my views (as a citizen) on the current situation with the mayor. I’ve been slapped down enough. I do not know who did what to my property. I have lived through worse. I just think it is tragic that by exercising my rights under the First Amendment that I am accused by David Henson of hijacking this thread and by Christine Stanton of being unstable. Shame on each of you. These are innuendos — an attempt to discredit me.

    UNCLE — I am convinced that I cannot and do not want to express any further contributions as an informed, educated citizen. I want no further speculations or retributions.

    As Edward Murrow said: “Good Night and Good Luck”.

    #46

  47. Icon
    Christine Stanton
    December 24, 2007 1:02 am

    Whoa, Martha. I specifically stated that I did NOT believe you needed a therapist! AND, I never said that I did not believe you! I admire your strength and demand of ethical behavior.

    However, after your last response I question your ethics, and I take offense at being shamed. I believe you perceived much more than what I stated. You might be surprised that I may agree with you on several issues.

    I finally am done with my cookie baking. Good Night. In all sincerity, I am not sure if I want to say “Good Luck” as it seems mine was not so great tonight. At least the cookies turned out. :)

    I hope all of us who log on to Locally Grown will have better things to do than watch this blog the next couple of days. I SINCERELY Wish You All A Merry Christmas!

    #47

  48. Icon
    Sean Hayford O'Leary
    December 24, 2007 2:34 am

    Martha, I can’t entirely speak for David, but I think his frustration was just that your personal troubles with this vandal were consuming the much broader thread. I understood his “hijacking” comment to say that though your situation was unfortunate, this was not the place for people to express their sympathies at length.

    Kiffi, it looks like the thought police got to your comment from 1:54 this morning. It seemed to be getting this conversation back on track, though, so I hope to see a cleaned up version in the morning.

    02:38: My bad, the e-mail messages got out of order and I see Kiffi’s comment is up above a few others. So… Lee Lansing.

    #48

  49. Icon
    Anne Bretts
    December 24, 2007 7:51 am

    Sean and David,
    I think Martha’s experience was directly related to this conversation and the spontaneous comments were a welcome and kind Christmas gesture of good will. We have talked for more than a year about the same City Hall issues and none of us have changed our opinions, we just keep sparring with the same arguments. Taking a moment to be kind and discuss the limits of civil disagreement is not a bad thing.
    Martha and Christine,
    You both seem like lovely people and I’d hate to see you leave the conversation. And do consider the party idea.
    Kiffi,
    I don’t think anyone was bitching at you, just disagreeing.
    You and I don’t agree on much of anything, and your comments often show a disdain for others that I find sad in such a brilliant woman. Still, I do admire the obvious love you and Victor have for each other and the passion you show for your beliefs and interests. You are an amazing couple.
    I wish you the best for the holidays and peace and compassion in the new year.
    David, I promise we can get back to Mayor’s wrong/Mayor’s a victim comments soon. Until then you can just go back and read the comments over the last year. Nothing has changed. Sadly.

    #49

  50. Icon
    Felicity Enders
    December 24, 2007 8:46 am

    I thought I’d take a moment to write down some things I’m thinking about Northfield as the year ends.

    I’m glad I live in a town where the buildings downtown are both historic and cared-for.

    I’m glad I live in a town where most businesses downtown are independent and busy.

    I’m glad I live in a town where the downtown can close to celebrate Harry Potter Day.

    I’m glad I live in the town that stopped the James-Younger Gang.

    I’m glad I live in a town with two premiere colleges.

    I’m glad I live in a small town that’s still surrounded by farms.

    I’m glad I live in a town where it’s easy to purchase organic local produce, and where the terms fair-trade and locally-grown are taken seriously.

    I’m glad I live in a town in which many people are highly educated and thoughtful.

    I’m glad I live in a town where people pay attention to what’s going on at city hall.

    I’m glad I live in a town in which people care enough to stand up for what they believe is right.

    I hope I live in a town in which no one would respond to thoughtful discussion with anonymous retribution.

    #50

  51. Icon
    Martha Cashman
    December 24, 2007 9:46 am

    Kiffi, I am not “bitching at you” nor have I sent or said anything that could remotely be construed as “hate” email— I am merely voicing my view on the events in my community. I know and have sympathized with you and Victor on the treatment you have received because you have been the ‘lone voice in the wilderness’ on many, many issues. I remain very sorry for all that you and Victor have had to endure.

    I am sorry that I blogged my life story and frustrations (hijacked this thread) but I will concede that this is a difficult time of year.

    I am sorry if I got ‘hot’ under the collar and ‘attacked’ anyone on in my comments (sorry Christine, sorry David). It has been made more emotional due to the actions of the mayor and the allegations against the city council and, yes, my brother.

    I love Northfield, I have cherished my friendship with Victor and Kiffi, and I love my brother whom I know as a serious, caring and honorable man who, along with five other council members, is doing what the law dictates.

    There is a fresh coat of snow covering all of yesterday’s ugliness. I wish every reader, the most joyous blessings of this Season and may we all find a way to heal ourselves and this community in the New Year.

    #51

  52. Icon
    John Thomas
    December 24, 2007 9:47 am

    Right now… the morning is beautiful, I am on my third cup of tea, and the three tenors are singing Silent Night on the radio.

    My son is outside playing in the snow, good things are baking, my wife is finishing wrapping, and our guest are heading in from all over.

    Peace to all. This will all be here on Wednesday.

    Let us all reflect, and be with our loved ones. It is what is most important.

    It is time for a Christmas truce.

    I am happy to be blessed with a wonderful community. I love you all, even if I may or may not share your viewpoint. It is what makes America great. God bless you and yours this holiday season. May everyone find the peace and reconcilliation that this community needs.

    And with that, I put away the keyboard, and power down the laptop. See you on Wednesday. I’m going to go play in the snow. 8-)

    MERRY CHRISTMAS!

    #52

  53. Icon
    Lisa Guidry
    December 24, 2007 10:00 am

    Martha, I’m glad you decided to join us again, and I understand how you feel that the holidays can be a difficult time. Please e-mail me so we can continue this discussion. Lguidry@LL.net (all lower case)

    #53

  54. Icon
    Griff Wigley
    December 24, 2007 3:36 pm

    As of 3:30 pm, Mayor Lansing had not yet turned in his keys, according to City Administrator Al Roder who I spoke to by phone.

    #54

  55. Icon
    Griff Wigley
    December 26, 2007 7:38 am

    An updated story with a sidebar in today’s Northfield News by Suzy Rook: Mayor tells council he won’t resign: Council votes 6-0 to censure Lansing

    #55

  56. Icon
    Griff Wigley
    December 26, 2007 8:03 am

    Today’s Northfield News editorial: Residents must recall Mayor Lansing.

    Although the process is long and difficult, a recall must be launched. To do anything else is to send a message to the rest of the state that Northfield is content to allow an unethical politician remain in office. Without a recall, the best we can expect is more of the same from this mayor.

    #56

  57. Icon
    Mike Bull
    December 26, 2007 11:05 am

    Strikes me that it might be a good idea for each of the city council folks to have a town meeting with the citizens in their ward (or, in the case of the at large member, the entire city), to explain what they think is going on at city hall and why they voted the way they did. I think it would help to have that kind of conversation.

    #57

  58. Icon
    kiffi summa
    December 26, 2007 12:40 pm

    On this issue of the keys to the Mayor’s office : The Mayor IS the Mayor until he is removed by a citizen recall process. The council is free to censure him and has done so; that action has no legal effect to remove either the privileges or the responsibilities of his elected title/office.

    I remembered reading something in the code or charter once about the responsibilities of the Mayor in an Emergency. It is found in the City Code Chapter 18. Read the entire Chapter; the definition section 18-27,, under the definition of “emergency” states that such can be “declared by the governor … or proclaimed by the Mayor” (my words: they are equated, as to responsibility in their gov’t unit).
    Go on to 18-29 Duties of Emergency Management… part(i) “The Mayor shall have direct responsibility during the declared emergency” (further language regarding the mayor’s duties and the equation of them to a governor).
    18-30 part(a) … “the Mayor may by proclamation promulgate regulation” etc., etc., and part(b) “every proclamation of emergency regulations shall be in writing and signed by the Mayor” …. “posted at such places as designated by the Mayor “… (further language on the Mayor’s role).

    It should be noted that throughout this chapter of the city code the administrator’s role is defined as implementing the policy.

    So, the City Code makes the Mayor responsible on many levels for functioning in an emergency of any nature, equates his role within this small gov’t unit to that of the governor of a state, and the ramifications of this responsibility go all the way from local, up to the Homeland Security Act.

    The effect of what the council did in their resolution, is to censure the Mayor; that censure has no legal effect on the office he was elected to hold, and the responsibility of that office can only be removed by the outcome of a public recall election.

    I would appreciate anyone responding to this, first reading the appropriate chapter of the city code, rather than just opining on the Mayor’s actions. Thank you.

    #58

  59. Icon
    Curt Benson
    December 26, 2007 1:19 pm

    Cashman’s remarks from last Saturday’s meeting start at about the 60 minute mark on the podast. He explains in detail why he believes Lansing’s office should be taken away and why Lansing should return his keys. Apparently, no part time mayor in a town of our size has his own office provided at city expense, on city property. I’m not sure, but I don’t believe previous mayors have had this perk. The keys in question include a “master key” or “grand master key” which can be used to access any office in the building.

    To me, taking away Lansing’s office while he is still in office gives the appearance of pettiness, although I can understand the opposite view. However, I see why Lansing should have to return his “grand master key” especially now that we see that Lansing has been willing to bend the rules to favor his interests.

    The office/key issue is something that could easily be clarified with a little research. Howabout it, Northfield News?

    Another issue that I’d like to see clarified by the traditional main stream media would be Lansing’s shifting his unpaid, past due water utility bills (from his/his son’s store) to the people who own his building now–who Lee is feuding with. Again, this isn’t a complicated issue– a little digging should be able to make this issue understandable.

    #59

  60. Icon
    victor summa
    December 26, 2007 9:02 pm

    Curt in #59 asks….

    Re the water charges for the 618 Division Street property.

    My understanding is Lansing entered into a sales transaction on the building at 618 Div. St. with a group (evidently Mr. Lutz and Ms. Closner). Part of the sales transaction