<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the matter with Kansas Northfield? Too many of us are snobs.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/</link>
	<description>The people, issues, and events of Northfield, MN</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 04:37:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griff Wigley</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-4/#comment-59156</link>
		<dc:creator>Griff Wigley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59156</guid>
		<description>I humbly accept your suggestion, Kiffi. Thank you, John.

Let&#039;s put this discussion to sleep and vow to be on the alert for ways in which our own &#039;inner snob&#039; can sneak out and get in the way of problem-solving and community-building. Antidote: humility.

Comments are now turned off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I humbly accept your suggestion, Kiffi. Thank you, John.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s put this discussion to sleep and vow to be on the alert for ways in which our own &#8216;inner snob&#8217; can sneak out and get in the way of problem-solving and community-building. Antidote: humility.</p>
<p>Comments are now turned off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiffi summa</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-4/#comment-59154</link>
		<dc:creator>kiffi summa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59154</guid>
		<description>Griff: It is well known I don&#039;t agree with John G&#039;s religious views, and John: you know that and accept that , but I think John had the perfect last word on this thread ... humility.

KIFFI
P.S. That  means you ought to end it, Griff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Griff: It is well known I don&#8217;t agree with John G&#8217;s religious views, and John: you know that and accept that , but I think John had the perfect last word on this thread &#8230; humility.</p>
<p>KIFFI<br />
P.S. That  means you ought to end it, Griff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Enders</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-4/#comment-59155</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Enders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59155</guid>
		<description>Humility is an excellent virtue to embrace, irrespective of one&#039;s religious perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humility is an excellent virtue to embrace, irrespective of one&#8217;s religious perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john george</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-4/#comment-59149</link>
		<dc:creator>john george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 03:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59149</guid>
		<description>Anne- As always, a well thought out and expressed opinion. It&#039;s probably good we don&#039;t agree on everything. We might be dangerous. But, that is probably snobbery on my part.

Going back to Griff&#039;s original thread, (heck, after 155 posts, why not?) no one has proposed an antidote to snobbishness. I have one, but I&#039;m sure it will stir up a hornets&#039; nest if I suggest it. But then, I&#039;m just ornery enough to do that. The weather is warm, and we may as well have a few hornets buzzing.

Phillipians 2 states this,&quot; Have this attitude which was also in Christ Jesus, who, though He existed as God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself and became obedient to death, even death on a cross.&quot; I think that if anyone had a right to look down upon sinful man, it was He, who, according to scripture, was without sin. He chose not to, though, and by His obedience, opened the way for sinful man to come to God. This is the gospel we preach. So, if you have a relationship with God through Jesus, you have the opportunity to embrace this same perspective of yourself toward others. This is the best antidote I have seen for snobbishness. It is called humility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne- As always, a well thought out and expressed opinion. It&#8217;s probably good we don&#8217;t agree on everything. We might be dangerous. But, that is probably snobbery on my part.</p>
<p>Going back to Griff&#8217;s original thread, (heck, after 155 posts, why not?) no one has proposed an antidote to snobbishness. I have one, but I&#8217;m sure it will stir up a hornets&#8217; nest if I suggest it. But then, I&#8217;m just ornery enough to do that. The weather is warm, and we may as well have a few hornets buzzing.</p>
<p>Phillipians 2 states this,&#8221; Have this attitude which was also in Christ Jesus, who, though He existed as God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself and became obedient to death, even death on a cross.&#8221; I think that if anyone had a right to look down upon sinful man, it was He, who, according to scripture, was without sin. He chose not to, though, and by His obedience, opened the way for sinful man to come to God. This is the gospel we preach. So, if you have a relationship with God through Jesus, you have the opportunity to embrace this same perspective of yourself toward others. This is the best antidote I have seen for snobbishness. It is called humility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felicity Enders</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-4/#comment-59147</link>
		<dc:creator>Felicity Enders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 03:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59147</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m certainly a snob.  I&#039;m over-educated, and when I drink coffee it&#039;s nearly always a latte.  But one of the things I love about Northfield is that I regularly have good conversations with people who I suspect are snobs of different stripes.  

However, I don&#039;t feel the same about the discussion on this thread.  Conversations like this make me feel unwelcome, and as such I don&#039;t think they&#039;re in the best interests of this town.  I would hope the town would welcome just about anyone who thought highly enough of Northfield to choose to live here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m certainly a snob.  I&#8217;m over-educated, and when I drink coffee it&#8217;s nearly always a latte.  But one of the things I love about Northfield is that I regularly have good conversations with people who I suspect are snobs of different stripes.  </p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t feel the same about the discussion on this thread.  Conversations like this make me feel unwelcome, and as such I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re in the best interests of this town.  I would hope the town would welcome just about anyone who thought highly enough of Northfield to choose to live here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Bretts</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-4/#comment-59144</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Bretts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 02:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59144</guid>
		<description>Jane, once again, I think it&#039;s OK to disagree with people, but to assume you&#039;re right and simply decree that others are wrong is what leads to the feeling that people here are snobs. 
I have seen so many other cities where people like Bruce A. and David L. and others would have sat down after the Target debacle and figured out some compromise positions to avoid a repeat. And yet issue after issue, it seems the most involved people here are more interested in proving whose position is right than in finding a plan or process everyone can back -- and really bringing others into the discussion. And so years after Target and the loss of College City Beverage and the movie theater and years after the hospital decision you still are no farther along in creating a respectful inclusive process and plan -- and the businesses go elsewhere and the new people shop elsewhere because they don&#039;t have enough incentive to be involved here. Just look at the annexation thread, which now includes dozens of variations on &#039;because I say so&#039; arguments.
Sad, when you&#039;re all neighbors and the town is so small. But the perfect way to keep it small and make sure no one else suits up and threatens to take your positions in the endless rematches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane, once again, I think it&#8217;s OK to disagree with people, but to assume you&#8217;re right and simply decree that others are wrong is what leads to the feeling that people here are snobs.<br />
I have seen so many other cities where people like Bruce A. and David L. and others would have sat down after the Target debacle and figured out some compromise positions to avoid a repeat. And yet issue after issue, it seems the most involved people here are more interested in proving whose position is right than in finding a plan or process everyone can back &#8212; and really bringing others into the discussion. And so years after Target and the loss of College City Beverage and the movie theater and years after the hospital decision you still are no farther along in creating a respectful inclusive process and plan &#8212; and the businesses go elsewhere and the new people shop elsewhere because they don&#8217;t have enough incentive to be involved here. Just look at the annexation thread, which now includes dozens of variations on &#8216;because I say so&#8217; arguments.<br />
Sad, when you&#8217;re all neighbors and the town is so small. But the perfect way to keep it small and make sure no one else suits up and threatens to take your positions in the endless rematches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bright Spencer</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-4/#comment-59142</link>
		<dc:creator>Bright Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 00:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59142</guid>
		<description>David L said:
&quot;So, whether Griff is a progressive liberal elite, self-interested liberal idealist, or a bobo, is not the question. The question is whether there are too many arrogant bobos in town.&quot;

My answer is always the same, if you are not honoring yourself, your God/gods, your family, your friends, you are wasting time.  And that is the real sadness, the real shame and the real deal of it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David L said:<br />
&#8220;So, whether Griff is a progressive liberal elite, self-interested liberal idealist, or a bobo, is not the question. The question is whether there are too many arrogant bobos in town.&#8221;</p>
<p>My answer is always the same, if you are not honoring yourself, your God/gods, your family, your friends, you are wasting time.  And that is the real sadness, the real shame and the real deal of it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Schons</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-4/#comment-59137</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Schons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 19:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59137</guid>
		<description>Regarding abortion rights: I only brought them up because John George implied that he votes Republican because of that party&#039;s anti-choice stand, while he also pronounced himself pessimistic on the possiblity of breaking the stranglehold of our political duopoly. I merely meant to convey that it&#039;s too bad focusing on just the one issue meant he also ended up supporting the entirety of the Republican agenda.

&quot;Do any of you recognize that you may be a snob?&quot;

Yes, I can be a tremendous snob, depending on the context.

I also think that right now in the U.S. citizens are more intolerant of each other than ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding abortion rights: I only brought them up because John George implied that he votes Republican because of that party&#8217;s anti-choice stand, while he also pronounced himself pessimistic on the possiblity of breaking the stranglehold of our political duopoly. I merely meant to convey that it&#8217;s too bad focusing on just the one issue meant he also ended up supporting the entirety of the Republican agenda.</p>
<p>&#8220;Do any of you recognize that you may be a snob?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, I can be a tremendous snob, depending on the context.</p>
<p>I also think that right now in the U.S. citizens are more intolerant of each other than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Moline</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-4/#comment-59133</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Moline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59133</guid>
		<description>Bright and Nathan, you are both wrong.  What the Democrats say is that we will not adopt any one religious belief as the law of the land. 

If you are against abortion, for whatever reason, you are welcome in the Democratic party--just don&#039;t try to use it to force others to adopt religious law.  

You are welcome to attempt to persuade others to your views.

What is most interesting in this thread is how you&#039;all think you know what everybody else is saying better than the ones saying it.  It is revealing about your own prejudices and snobbery.  

Some claim that they have an affiliation with somewhere else so they are not a Northfield snob.  Right.  

I went to high school in Faribault and I live in DUNDAS.  So there.  

The real question to me is: are Northfielder&#039;s really snobs, or are &quot;snobs&quot; in the eyes of the beholder?  i.e., do Faribault citizens think Northfielder&#039;s are snobs, and why?  Because their mom said so?  Because of a personal experience? 

What experience do the people on this discussion have of snobbery?  Are you snobby to people?  How?  How do you know if people think you are a snob--do they tell you?

Do any of you recognize that you may be a snob?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bright and Nathan, you are both wrong.  What the Democrats say is that we will not adopt any one religious belief as the law of the land. </p>
<p>If you are against abortion, for whatever reason, you are welcome in the Democratic party--just don&#8217;t try to use it to force others to adopt religious law.  </p>
<p>You are welcome to attempt to persuade others to your views.</p>
<p>What is most interesting in this thread is how you&#8217;all think you know what everybody else is saying better than the ones saying it.  It is revealing about your own prejudices and snobbery.  </p>
<p>Some claim that they have an affiliation with somewhere else so they are not a Northfield snob.  Right.  </p>
<p>I went to high school in Faribault and I live in DUNDAS.  So there.  </p>
<p>The real question to me is: are Northfielder&#8217;s really snobs, or are &#8220;snobs&#8221; in the eyes of the beholder?  i.e., do Faribault citizens think Northfielder&#8217;s are snobs, and why?  Because their mom said so?  Because of a personal experience? </p>
<p>What experience do the people on this discussion have of snobbery?  Are you snobby to people?  How?  How do you know if people think you are a snob--do they tell you?</p>
<p>Do any of you recognize that you may be a snob?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ludescher</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-4/#comment-59132</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ludescher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59132</guid>
		<description>Chris:  Griff&#039;s suggestion was that he was a progressive liberal elite who is unable to recognize his own arrogance in dealing with people in the public sector, especially with people who weren&#039;t as smart as he.  He also suggested that Northfield was about 50% full of people like him.  

So, whether Griff is a progressive liberal elite, self-interested liberal idealist, or a bobo, is not the question.  The question is whether there are too many arrogant bobos in town.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris:  Griff&#8217;s suggestion was that he was a progressive liberal elite who is unable to recognize his own arrogance in dealing with people in the public sector, especially with people who weren&#8217;t as smart as he.  He also suggested that Northfield was about 50% full of people like him.  </p>
<p>So, whether Griff is a progressive liberal elite, self-interested liberal idealist, or a bobo, is not the question.  The question is whether there are too many arrogant bobos in town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Bretts</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59130</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Bretts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59130</guid>
		<description>Chris, a person can be profoundly against abortion without wanting it to be illegal. There are moral issues that don&#039;t necessarily have to have a legal solution. Throwing women and doctors in jail doesn&#039;t really solve the problem. Promoting responsibility, access to alternative forms of birth control, and adoption all can change the situation in more rational ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, a person can be profoundly against abortion without wanting it to be illegal. There are moral issues that don&#8217;t necessarily have to have a legal solution. Throwing women and doctors in jail doesn&#8217;t really solve the problem. Promoting responsibility, access to alternative forms of birth control, and adoption all can change the situation in more rational ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan E. Kuhlman</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59126</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan E. Kuhlman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 15:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59126</guid>
		<description>Bright, I don&#039;t see how you can possibly make that inference. 

If anything, Chris Schon&#039;s comment points out the unfortunate situation that the Democratic party has basically written off everybody with any kind of ethical, moral, or even aesthetic reservations about the practice of abortion. 

(Having only the most tangential relationship to the original thread topic.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bright, I don&#8217;t see how you can possibly make that inference. </p>
<p>If anything, Chris Schon&#8217;s comment points out the unfortunate situation that the Democratic party has basically written off everybody with any kind of ethical, moral, or even aesthetic reservations about the practice of abortion. </p>
<p>(Having only the most tangential relationship to the original thread topic.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bright Spencer</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59123</link>
		<dc:creator>Bright Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 12:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59123</guid>
		<description>Chris S. said, &quot; Under the current duopoly of political parties, a voter who is against abortion rights ends up supporting the entirety of the Republican package (war, deficit spending, erosion of Constitutional rights, etc.), and I think that’s terrible.&quot;

Well, if you put it that way, you are saying that is is better to kill a baby who has no defense except Republicans, over a man/woman/soldier who does have other ways to avert death within their grasp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris S. said, &#8221; Under the current duopoly of political parties, a voter who is against abortion rights ends up supporting the entirety of the Republican package (war, deficit spending, erosion of Constitutional rights, etc.), and I think that’s terrible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, if you put it that way, you are saying that is is better to kill a baby who has no defense except Republicans, over a man/woman/soldier who does have other ways to avert death within their grasp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Schons</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59114</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Schons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 03:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59114</guid>
		<description>More on Brooks (from Wikipedia):

&quot;Before the Iraq War, Brooks argued forcefully on moral grounds for American military intervention, echoing the belief of neoconservative commentators and political figures that American and British forces would be welcomed as liberators.&quot; 

Well, Brooks (born in Canada) needs to get over to Iraq now and personally help clean up the mess he helped create.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on Brooks (from Wikipedia):</p>
<p>&#8220;Before the Iraq War, Brooks argued forcefully on moral grounds for American military intervention, echoing the belief of neoconservative commentators and political figures that American and British forces would be welcomed as liberators.&#8221; </p>
<p>Well, Brooks (born in Canada) needs to get over to Iraq now and personally help clean up the mess he helped create.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Schons</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59113</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Schons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59113</guid>
		<description>John: Under the current duopoly of political parties, a voter who is against abortion rights ends up supporting the entirety of the Republican package (war, deficit spending, erosion of Constitutional rights, etc.), and I think that&#039;s terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: Under the current duopoly of political parties, a voter who is against abortion rights ends up supporting the entirety of the Republican package (war, deficit spending, erosion of Constitutional rights, etc.), and I think that&#8217;s terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Schons</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59112</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Schons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59112</guid>
		<description>The term &quot;bobo&quot;: I resent it because of its connection to David Brooks, a tiresome and dogmatic blowhard in thrall to his reactionary puppetmasters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term &#8220;bobo&#8221;: I resent it because of its connection to David Brooks, a tiresome and dogmatic blowhard in thrall to his reactionary puppetmasters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ludescher</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59111</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ludescher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59111</guid>
		<description>Anne and Penny:  Thanks for turning the conversation back to Northfield bobos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne and Penny:  Thanks for turning the conversation back to Northfield bobos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john george</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59108</link>
		<dc:creator>john george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59108</guid>
		<description>Chris- I&#039;ve been ruminating on your suggestion of a third party in American politics. If it is a srong one, as what Ross Perot did in 1992, you end up with an election where the winner does not have near half the vote. In this case, Bill Clinton won on 43% of the popular vote. That appears to say that 57% of the population voted against him. That is probably accurate, since Perot was more conservative than moderate, and I&#039;m not sure he siphoned away as many Democratic voters as he did Republican. The result was to split the conservative iniative to the point that the Democratic candidate won by the 43% margin. In 1996, Clinton garnered 49% of the popular vote, which is probably a more realistic evaluation of the spread when there are only two strong parties. It appears that a strong third party will not necessarily accomplish the will of the majority of the population, but simply divide that majority so a relative minority can rule. So, I&#039;m not really sure that having a third party will really accomplish anything. Now, does that make me a snob?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris- I&#8217;ve been ruminating on your suggestion of a third party in American politics. If it is a srong one, as what Ross Perot did in 1992, you end up with an election where the winner does not have near half the vote. In this case, Bill Clinton won on 43% of the popular vote. That appears to say that 57% of the population voted against him. That is probably accurate, since Perot was more conservative than moderate, and I&#8217;m not sure he siphoned away as many Democratic voters as he did Republican. The result was to split the conservative iniative to the point that the Democratic candidate won by the 43% margin. In 1996, Clinton garnered 49% of the popular vote, which is probably a more realistic evaluation of the spread when there are only two strong parties. It appears that a strong third party will not necessarily accomplish the will of the majority of the population, but simply divide that majority so a relative minority can rule. So, I&#8217;m not really sure that having a third party will really accomplish anything. Now, does that make me a snob?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penny Hillemann</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59106</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny Hillemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 00:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59106</guid>
		<description>I must admit I&#039;ve been cringing as I&#039;ve read the posts of the past few days -- whisked back to the days of my youth when my mother and brother were arguing and I just wanted to put the pillow over my head and muffle the sounds...

Back to Griff&#039;s original post -- Anne, you make many good points, though I don&#039;t think Faribault residents&#039; perception of Northfielders as snobs stems from there being a &quot;small but vocal group of people in Northfield who believe they know what&#039;s best for everyone,&quot; though Northfield residents may have that reaction to such a group.  (Isn&#039;t there probably such a group or groups in almost any community?) 

I think it does come down to judgments based on educational differences and perhaps voting pattern differences. I do know well-educated people who tend to think less of people who don&#039;t go to college, though I also know plenty who don&#039;t. And I have a perception -- I don&#039;t know how accurate -- that quite a lot of people who don&#039;t go to college think that those who do are less grounded in what the former, quite reasonably, see as reality, and have a certain amount of scorn for them as a result. 

What I&#039;m saying, I guess, is that elements of each community are snobby about the others in their own ways. And it&#039;s probably self-perpetuating, just as children&#039;s games are. Faribault kids grow up &quot;knowing&quot; that Northfielders are over-educated snobs, and Northfielders &quot;know&quot; that Faribault is a less-educated, more blue-collar community. And there&#039;s some truth to both perceptions, but to hold either universally true would be a gross overgeneralization. Does it mean that Northfielders really are more snobby than anyone else? I&#039;m not sure that it does. I expect that just about any time you have clear demographic differences between adjacent communities, these types of feelings are likely to exist. When opportunities arise to build bridges and dispel the stereotypes, let&#039;s take them, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s our (Northfield&#039;s) issue alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit I&#8217;ve been cringing as I&#8217;ve read the posts of the past few days &#8212; whisked back to the days of my youth when my mother and brother were arguing and I just wanted to put the pillow over my head and muffle the sounds&#8230;</p>
<p>Back to Griff&#8217;s original post &#8212; Anne, you make many good points, though I don&#8217;t think Faribault residents&#8217; perception of Northfielders as snobs stems from there being a &#8220;small but vocal group of people in Northfield who believe they know what&#8217;s best for everyone,&#8221; though Northfield residents may have that reaction to such a group.  (Isn&#8217;t there probably such a group or groups in almost any community?) </p>
<p>I think it does come down to judgments based on educational differences and perhaps voting pattern differences. I do know well-educated people who tend to think less of people who don&#8217;t go to college, though I also know plenty who don&#8217;t. And I have a perception &#8212; I don&#8217;t know how accurate &#8212; that quite a lot of people who don&#8217;t go to college think that those who do are less grounded in what the former, quite reasonably, see as reality, and have a certain amount of scorn for them as a result. </p>
<p>What I&#8217;m saying, I guess, is that elements of each community are snobby about the others in their own ways. And it&#8217;s probably self-perpetuating, just as children&#8217;s games are. Faribault kids grow up &#8220;knowing&#8221; that Northfielders are over-educated snobs, and Northfielders &#8220;know&#8221; that Faribault is a less-educated, more blue-collar community. And there&#8217;s some truth to both perceptions, but to hold either universally true would be a gross overgeneralization. Does it mean that Northfielders really are more snobby than anyone else? I&#8217;m not sure that it does. I expect that just about any time you have clear demographic differences between adjacent communities, these types of feelings are likely to exist. When opportunities arise to build bridges and dispel the stereotypes, let&#8217;s take them, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s our (Northfield&#8217;s) issue alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Bretts</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59086</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Bretts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 04:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59086</guid>
		<description>Patrick, Lyndon Johnson was a complicated man who used the &#039;N&#039; word in private and voted against civil rights legislation after World War II and yet ended up engineering the passage of the largest changes in civil rights law in history. My point was that Johnson was more interested in amassing his own personal power more than he was in progressive causes. 
The south in particular ended up with a lot of Dixiecrats who were anything but well-educated progressives. George Wallace comes to mind and might have been a more clear example.
I don&#039;t support Bush, but Republicans don&#039;t have a lock on stupidity. 
In the area where I grew up near Chicago, poorly educated union workers voted Democratic, supported the death penalty and belonged to the Klan. I started college at 18, dropped out and went back in my 40s. Did I become more liberal after I went back to school and became better educated? Did I vote Republican while I was a dropout? No. 
Many people with high IQs don&#039;t have access to higher education, or even a high school diploma. The greatest minds of the Catholic Church over generations have opposed abortion, made justifications for the Crusades and anti-Semitism and refused to give women the same rights as men. And they vote Democratic more than Republican. Go figure. 
So we&#039;re back to the core of this thread, the idea of being snobs, of making sweeping generalizations about groups and looking down on those who disagree with you.
John George and I have disagreed on many issues over the five years we have known each other, but I do not presume that I am smarter than he is. On the contrary, I admire and envy his interest in academic pursuits while I watch too much HGTV. 
My answer to the original question is yes, I think there is a small but vocal group of people in Northfield who believe they know what&#039;s best for everyone. In the three years I have lived here, I have seen no indication that they have tried to build coalitions or work with others or compromise. 
In fact, the very idea that the majority doesn&#039;t agree with them only reassures them of their special status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, Lyndon Johnson was a complicated man who used the &#8216;N&#8217; word in private and voted against civil rights legislation after World War II and yet ended up engineering the passage of the largest changes in civil rights law in history. My point was that Johnson was more interested in amassing his own personal power more than he was in progressive causes.<br />
The south in particular ended up with a lot of Dixiecrats who were anything but well-educated progressives. George Wallace comes to mind and might have been a more clear example.<br />
I don&#8217;t support Bush, but Republicans don&#8217;t have a lock on stupidity.<br />
In the area where I grew up near Chicago, poorly educated union workers voted Democratic, supported the death penalty and belonged to the Klan. I started college at 18, dropped out and went back in my 40s. Did I become more liberal after I went back to school and became better educated? Did I vote Republican while I was a dropout? No.<br />
Many people with high IQs don&#8217;t have access to higher education, or even a high school diploma. The greatest minds of the Catholic Church over generations have opposed abortion, made justifications for the Crusades and anti-Semitism and refused to give women the same rights as men. And they vote Democratic more than Republican. Go figure.<br />
So we&#8217;re back to the core of this thread, the idea of being snobs, of making sweeping generalizations about groups and looking down on those who disagree with you.<br />
John George and I have disagreed on many issues over the five years we have known each other, but I do not presume that I am smarter than he is. On the contrary, I admire and envy his interest in academic pursuits while I watch too much HGTV.<br />
My answer to the original question is yes, I think there is a small but vocal group of people in Northfield who believe they know what&#8217;s best for everyone. In the three years I have lived here, I have seen no indication that they have tried to build coalitions or work with others or compromise.<br />
In fact, the very idea that the majority doesn&#8217;t agree with them only reassures them of their special status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Schons</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59082</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Schons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59082</guid>
		<description>&quot;I am certainly not convinced to change my party affiliations from Republican to Democrat.&quot;

Obviously, Americans need more than these two parties to choose from. In what other realm of life do we put with only two options?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am certainly not convinced to change my party affiliations from Republican to Democrat.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obviously, Americans need more than these two parties to choose from. In what other realm of life do we put with only two options?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John George</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59081</link>
		<dc:creator>John George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59081</guid>
		<description>Ray- Your quote attributed to Alexander Tyler is, unfortunately, something he did not say (oh, how I wish it was). His name is Lord Woodhousely, Alexander Fraser Tytler (with the second &quot;t&quot;). On the site you referenced, there are a couple books referenced which, according to the Library of Congress, do not exist. You can look it up on Snopes under &quot;Alexander Tyler.&quot; He was a professor of history, and he did have a collection of some of his lectures put together, but there are no cross references in the text that resemble any of the quotes attributed to him. None the less, I am certainly not convinced to change my party affiliations from Republican to Democrat. Any party that can support legislation that gives civil rights to a medical procedure and a moral issue does not warrant my support. You can call me whatever name you want, but I am, as Paul stated in Romans 14, convinced in my own heart. And, as he concludes that chapter, I do not want to condemn myself by what I approve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray- Your quote attributed to Alexander Tyler is, unfortunately, something he did not say (oh, how I wish it was). His name is Lord Woodhousely, Alexander Fraser Tytler (with the second &#8220;t&#8221;). On the site you referenced, there are a couple books referenced which, according to the Library of Congress, do not exist. You can look it up on Snopes under &#8220;Alexander Tyler.&#8221; He was a professor of history, and he did have a collection of some of his lectures put together, but there are no cross references in the text that resemble any of the quotes attributed to him. None the less, I am certainly not convinced to change my party affiliations from Republican to Democrat. Any party that can support legislation that gives civil rights to a medical procedure and a moral issue does not warrant my support. You can call me whatever name you want, but I am, as Paul stated in Romans 14, convinced in my own heart. And, as he concludes that chapter, I do not want to condemn myself by what I approve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Moline</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59080</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Moline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59080</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the vote of confidence, Chris.  I am passionate about politics.

Ray, I agree with you 100%.  There seems to be no connection with intelligence and politics.  Of course there are several ways to interpret that statement. 

William, I am trying to say, and will say again, recognizing intelligence (or lack thereof) does not constitute snobbery.  Treating people like they deserve less than others is snobbery.  Stupid people can be snobs.  

I definitely want to provoke discussion when I say the majority of US citizens are less-than-bright.  Show me that I am wrong.  (For one, YOU are assuming that this is an insult when I think of it as stating an obvious fact--I don&#039;t attach much emotional baggage to it--I don&#039;t know if it is good or bad--maybe the not-so-bright are also very happy.)

If we all try real hard we can remember back to the summer of love (NOT lst year--40 years ago) when we were disillusioned by all of our politicians--liberal and conservatives--and we were going to all join communes and change the world.  Many believed the only way to change was through revolution.  

In studying democracies, the US is unique in its [past?] ability to make substantial changes without revolution.  Well, we better change quick or we are going to lose this republic that we all call home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the vote of confidence, Chris.  I am passionate about politics.</p>
<p>Ray, I agree with you 100%.  There seems to be no connection with intelligence and politics.  Of course there are several ways to interpret that statement. </p>
<p>William, I am trying to say, and will say again, recognizing intelligence (or lack thereof) does not constitute snobbery.  Treating people like they deserve less than others is snobbery.  Stupid people can be snobs.  </p>
<p>I definitely want to provoke discussion when I say the majority of US citizens are less-than-bright.  Show me that I am wrong.  (For one, YOU are assuming that this is an insult when I think of it as stating an obvious fact--I don&#8217;t attach much emotional baggage to it--I don&#8217;t know if it is good or bad--maybe the not-so-bright are also very happy.)</p>
<p>If we all try real hard we can remember back to the summer of love (NOT lst year--40 years ago) when we were disillusioned by all of our politicians--liberal and conservatives--and we were going to all join communes and change the world.  Many believed the only way to change was through revolution.  </p>
<p>In studying democracies, the US is unique in its [past?] ability to make substantial changes without revolution.  Well, we better change quick or we are going to lose this republic that we all call home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Schons</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59079</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Schons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59079</guid>
		<description>Now this discussion is getting fun!

It&#039;s good to read so many incisive comments, and thanks for the Alexander Tyler quote: unfortunately, it&#039;s right on the mark.

One point about the &quot;literate cities&quot; citation: the average literacy level of cities that voted for the Democratic presidential candidate in &#039;04 was higher than that of cities that voted for the Republican. Yes, cities tend to be more liberal than rural areas, but the study looked at diferrences AMONG cities, and found a glaring one.

As for this comment:

&quot;People with degrees tend to be Democratic not necessarily because they are smarter but because higher education is an extension of government and people who succeed there tend to believe government is the answer…&quot;

I could not disagree more vehemently. By this logic, soldiers would tend to vote Democratic because the military is part of the government.

Jane Moline: I appaud your passion; if every US citizen cared as much and saw as clearly, our nation would not be in such trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this discussion is getting fun!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to read so many incisive comments, and thanks for the Alexander Tyler quote: unfortunately, it&#8217;s right on the mark.</p>
<p>One point about the &#8220;literate cities&#8221; citation: the average literacy level of cities that voted for the Democratic presidential candidate in &#8217;04 was higher than that of cities that voted for the Republican. Yes, cities tend to be more liberal than rural areas, but the study looked at diferrences AMONG cities, and found a glaring one.</p>
<p>As for this comment:</p>
<p>&#8220;People with degrees tend to be Democratic not necessarily because they are smarter but because higher education is an extension of government and people who succeed there tend to believe government is the answer…&#8221;</p>
<p>I could not disagree more vehemently. By this logic, soldiers would tend to vote Democratic because the military is part of the government.</p>
<p>Jane Moline: I appaud your passion; if every US citizen cared as much and saw as clearly, our nation would not be in such trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Siemers</title>
		<link>http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/post/3292/comment-page-3/#comment-59078</link>
		<dc:creator>William Siemers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://locallygrownnorthfield.org/archives/3292/#comment-59078</guid>
		<description>Jane...Caustic? Perhaps...but if calling ordinary people &#039;idiots&#039; doesn&#039;t constitute intellectual snobbery I don&#039;t know what does.

Nathan...It almost seems like a &#039;false-flag&#039; operation.  Unfortunately, it is all too common.  I&#039;ll assume your reference to &#039;yokels&#039; was just stirring up the roux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane&#8230;Caustic? Perhaps&#8230;but if calling ordinary people &#8216;idiots&#8217; doesn&#8217;t constitute intellectual snobbery I don&#8217;t know what does.</p>
<p>Nathan&#8230;It almost seems like a &#8216;false-flag&#8217; operation.  Unfortunately, it is all too common.  I&#8217;ll assume your reference to &#8216;yokels&#8217; was just stirring up the roux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.502 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-24 02:20:36 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
